"Women are Dying Needlessly in Childbirth"
This Birth Love Column by LLM
appeared in Issue 15.1, June 29, 1999 of the OBCNEWS.
For a full listing of columns, go here.
This column came out of an online conversation
I had with an obstetrician. Here's its essence:
Me- "Birth 100 years ago was most often
delivered into the hands of lay midwives. Fatality
rates often went up when medical doctors became
involved..."
OB- "COULD I HAVE SOME DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
OF THIS?"
So here goes...
It is a lie of enormous proportions that homebirth
attended by midwives is dangerous, negligent,
and a killer of women and babies. Sarah Stone,
an eighteenth-century midwife and author of the
Complete Practice of Midwifery, said that more
mothers and children had died at the hands of
the new "barber-surgeons" than through
even the most incompetent of midwives.(1)
Study after study, decade after decade, has proven
that normal birth is safest when it takes place
without the attendance of rigorously-trained medical
professionals. This was first illuminated in a
major study of maternal mortality conducted in
Aberdeen, Scotland, in 1929. It was found that
mothers having homebirths with midwives in attendance
experienced a death rate of 2.8 per 1000, while
women attended at home by physicians had a rate
of 6.9 per 1000. But physicians overseeing births
in hospitals were found to have a startling maternal
mortality rate of 14.9 per 1000 births.(2)
U.S. studies also revealed that women were dying
needlessly in hospitalized childbirth. First,
the 1930 White House Conference on Child Health
and Protection found that American women were
dying at a rate of 7 per 1000; the high death
rate for birthing women was attributed to the
60-85% rate of instrumental deliveries, the exposure
to cross-infection, and the "often false
sense of security in the operating room"(3).
More startling news was published in the Maternal
Mortality in New York City: A Study of all Puerperal
Deaths, 1930-1932. 66% of the 2,041 maternal deaths
were discovered to have been preventable; also,
that physicians were responsible for 61.1% of
the deaths. And remarkably- only 2.2% of the maternal
deaths were attributable to the errors of midwives.
The committee who produced the study- the New
York Academy of Medicine's Committee on Public
Health Relations- also found that midwives had
the lowest maternal death rate of any birth attendant-
1.4 per 1000, while obstetricians had a death
rate of 5.4; surgeons, 9.9.(4)
A few years after the study was conducted, Iago
Galdston, the secretary on medical information
for the New York Academy of Medicine, reiterated
that the frequent use of forceps, anesthesia,
and surgery during childbirth were major causes
of needless maternal deaths.(4)
Women of today are foolish to think their survival
rates are exemplary. Data from death certificates
compiled by the Center for Disease Control's National
Center for Health Statistics revealed that more
women are dying from pregnancy and birth-related
reasons every year: the 1996 figures were eleven
deaths per 100,000 births, compared to seven per
100,000 in 1987.(5)
Marsden Wagner- pediatrician, neonatologist,
perinatal epidemiologist, and former Director
of Women's and Children's Health for the WHO-
believes that the increasing maternal death rate
may be due in part to the increasing rate of cesarean
section.
"Perhaps the most alarming data are those
showing a rise in the maternal mortality rate
in the US in recent years...Because the data give
only the leading cause of death and not underlying
causes, it is quite possible that the leading
cause of death, namely hemorrhage is, in many
cases, hemorrhage associated with cesarean section.
With all the unnecessary cesarean section done
today in the US...this could be part of the problem
of rising maternal mortality...Another possible
cause of the rising maternal mortality rate in
the US is the epidemic increase of epidural anesthesia
for labor pain
in Great Britain where there
is a careful audit of all maternal deaths including
underlying causes, epidural block is one of the
reported causes."(6)
It is noteworthy that a study published in the
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology found
that women are up to 16 times more likely to die
in childbirth after a cesarean section rather
than a vaginal delivery.(7)
More from Marsden Wagner, MD:
"350 to 1,000 women die every year in the
United States around the time of birth. Although
individual states have regulations that require
such deaths to be reported, no one, including
you or me or scientists wanting to study why these
women die, can get access to information on these
maternal deaths. We do know that at least half
these deaths are not reported, that black women
have a four times greater risk of maternal death,
that nearly all these women die in the hospital
rather than at home, and that with adequate medical
attention many if not most of these women need
not have died."(8)
Women giving birth with physicians in attendance
have an increased rate of dangerous, interventional
delivery. A 1992 study in the American Journal
of Public Health compared more than 1,000 planned,
direct-entry, midwife-assisted home births with
approximately 14,000 statistically matched hospital
births. Only 2.11 percent of the women who planned
to give birth at home experienced such interventions
as forceps, vacuum extractors, or C-sections;
while 26.6 percent of those who planned to give
birth in the hospital encountered these outcomes.(9)
And now, as in 1930, instrumental delivery, anesthesia,
exposure to dangerous microbes,(10) and a "false
sense of security in the operating room"
are major factors contributing to a rising maternal
death rate.
Midwives have the best maternal outcomes of any
birth professionals;(11) midwifery services- from
direct-entry midwives to certified nurse midwives-
must be freely available to all women who want
them. Birth is not about institutions profiting
from women's coerced dependence on the false promises
of modern medicine; birth is about women claiming
their intrinsic creativity, beauty and power in
dignity, safety and freedom.(12)
References:
- Jane B. Donegan, Women and Men Midwives: Medicine,
Morality, and Misogyny in Early America (Westport,
Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1978), p. 31
- "Doctoring the Family", transcript
from 1985 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
television series (an excellent historical reference;
write to CBC transcripts, P.O. Box 6640, Station
A, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3L4 to obtain a copy).
- Judy Barret Litoff, "American Midwives-
1860 to the Present" (Greenwood Press,
1978), pp. 108-113. A must-have for anyone interested
in midwifery and the origins of medicalized
birth.
- Ibid., 112.
- National Center for Health Statistics. Vital
statistics of the United States. Vol II -- mortality.
Part A. Hyattsville, Maryland: US Department
of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, CDC, 1967-1992.
also- WHO's
Maternal Mortality Rates.
- Maternal
Death Rate in the United States: WHERE ARE
THE DOCTORS?
- Sultan AH, Stanton SL. Preserving the pelvic
floor and perineum during childbirth- elective
caesarean section? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;
103: 731-734 (Education
and Debate- controversies in management
-see the "risks and benefits" section)
- Technology
in Birth: First Do No Harm by Marsden Wagner.
M.D.
- Durand, AM The Safety of Home Birth: The Farm
Study, American Journal of Public Health, March
1992: Vol. 82, No. 3:450-453
- Struelens, MJ The
epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in
hospital acquired infections: problems and
possible solutions BMJ 1998;317:652-654
Also see News
Reports of Hospital Acquired Infections.
- S Twaddle, G McIlwaine, WH Gilmour, M Reid,
I Greer, CB Lunan, M McGinley, I Johnstone.
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of
midwife-managed care. The Lancet, Volume 348,
Number 9022, Saturday 27 July 1996 (pp 210,
213-18)
Also see Homebirth
is Safe: The Medical Journal Citations and
Midwifery
Advocacy and Statistics.
- My own damned opinion.
Note that babies are dying needlessly in childbirth,
too. In 1998, the Centers for Disease Control
in Atlanta published the outcomes of a study of
every singleton vaginal birth in the United States
in 1991*. Excluding high risk births, and comparing
similar obstetrical cases, it was found that babies'
chances of dying in their first few days of life
were 23% higher if they were attended by doctors
rather than midwives in their births, and were
50% more likely to die in their first months of
life if they were attended by doctors. *MacDorman,
MF, Singh, GK. Midwifery care, social and medical
risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA. J
Epidemiol Community Health 1998 May;52(5):310-7
Also see:
Marjorie Tew. Safer Childbirth? A Critical History
of Maternity Care: Chapman and Hall, 1990
Bogdan, Janet Carlisle. Childbirth in America,
1650-1990. Pp.101-120.
Ehrenreich, Barbara and English, Deidre, Witches,
Midwives, and Nurses: A History of Women Healers.
Oyster Bay, NY:Glass Mountain Pamphlets, 1973.
Leavitt, Judith Walzer. Brought to Bed: Childbearing
in America 1750 to 1950. New York and Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1986.
Martin, Emily. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural
Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press,
1987.
Rothman, Barbara Katz. In Labor: Women and Power
in the Birthplace. New York and London: W.W. Norton
& Company, 1991.
Scully, Diana. Men Who Control Women's Health:
The Miseducation of Obstetrician - Gynecologists.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1980.
Scholten, Catherine M. Childbearing in American
Society: 1650-1850. New York and London: New York
University Press, 1985.
Wertz, Richard W. and Dorothy C. Wertz. Lying-In:
A History of Childbirth in America. New York:
The Free Press, 1977.
Obstetric
Myths Versus Research Realities by Henci Goer;
includes a chapter on midwives (23 abstracts)
and one on homebirth (23 abstracts), as well as
chapters on breech, epidurals, and other topics.
The table of contents plus the entire chapter
on episiotomy is online.
Midwifery
Today Issue No. 50, summer 1999, Theme: Homebirth
Articles include "Homebirth: What Are the
Issues" by Sara Wickham, "Ultrasound,
More Harm than Good?", by Marsden Wagner,
and "Drugs in Labor: What Effects Do They
Have Twenty Years Hence?" by Beverley Lawrence
Beech-- all three of these have references. .
|