Interventions
Copyright © Gloria Lemay, Vancouver B.C.
Canada. May 2002. This also appeared in Midwifery
Today Magazine, Issue 63, Autumn 2002
"The first intervention in natural childbirth
is the one that a healthy woman does herself
when she walks out the front door of her own
home in labour" -Michael Rosenthal,
Ob/Gyn.
This quote is an attention grabber and one that
should set us all to thinking. We know about the
"cascade of interventions" that sends
most North American births down a tunnel of medical
mishaps: strip membranes, pit/gel induction, fetal
heart continuous monitoring, pain medications,
distress in the infant, cesarean, post surgical
infection, breastfeeding problems, post partum
depression, etc. etc etc. Iatrogenic meddlesomeness
at it's most blatant is easy to spot and condemn.
We like to shake our heads, point our fingers
and tut-tut-tut about this type of intervention.
What of the interventions that we don't see and
are guilty of ourselves? The Oxford dictionary
defines intervene: to interfere, modify course
or result of events. Something that seems as small
as turning on a light could be classified as "an
intervention". Is it an intervention to wear
perfume to a birth? To monitor the heartbeat of
the baby every 1/2 hour? To leave a clock within
the mother's view? To watch the mother? To speak
to the mother? To ask her to take a walk outside?
To tell her husband to get in the water tub with
her? Do midwives take any time at all to ask themselves
these questions?
What would "the course of events" be
like if we weren't there? How could we possibly
know? Recently I came into possession of an amazing
video. This video is the raw home movie footage
of the births that are shown in the unassisted
birth film "A Clear Road to Birth".
There is no attendant present at the births. The
families have, for the most part, just put the
video camera on a tripod and let it run and the
result is an amazing view into a place that I
have never been privileged to enter- ,a birth
that is following the natural course of events.
I found it difficult to watch because it is so
very intimate, and I'm not sure that they wanted
me to watch their beautiful, family private moments.
It is a sacred film.
I come away from it with questions about how
my presence at a birth affects the behavior of
all the participants. The women on this film are
not saying "How much longer will it be?"
They are not saying "I can't do it anymore".
There is no illusion or possibility of some other
woman "saving" them, they are going
to do it themselves and they seem to have an inner
core of resolve about it. Their husbands and children
mostly seem "surprised" that the baby
is really there. This is unlike births where there
is an "expert" present and the waiting
and watching seems to go on forever.
This film of unattended births leads me to question
"What about women who have unassisted prenatal
care?" We are told that prenatal care is
essential. We believe it is a cornerstone of good
maternal/child health, but is this true? Are there
interventions that take place in Prepared Childbirth
classes that are subtle and affect the course
of events? If we think of the spoken word as "an
intervention", we must wonder if we are causing
changes in the course of the birth long before
the membranes release. I cringe at some of the
"meddlesome midwifery messages" that
women are given at prenatal checkups. Messages
can be imparted both verbally and non-verbally.
When I took prenatal classes 25 years ago, the
nurse managed to impart the message that she didn't
approve of breast-feeding with just the look on
her face when she said, "How many of you
are planning to breastfeed?" Her attitude
changed the course of events for a lot of the
women in my class. It was an intervention.
I have learned a lot about how to question my
own interference in birth from listening to French
obstetrician Michel Odent. His message is repeated
over and over: "The most important thing
is do not disturb the birthing mother". What
does a nice midwife do that would disturb? I went
to a birth as an assistant to the midwife several
years ago. I was assigned to take a video of the
birth and so I familiarized myself with the family's
camera and began to do a little filming of the
mother while she was in the watertub. I was getting
some nice footage when, all of a sudden, the room
went completely black and I couldn't get an image
in the camera. I looked up to see what had happened...
the brother-in-law of the birthing mother had
closed the lights. I went over and turned them
back on so I could get on with filming and, presently,
the man came back and turned them out again! I
was very annoyed and, in that moment, I realized
that he was right! He was more in tune with what
his sister-in-law needed than I was.
Birth seems to flow best for human beings in
the same conditions as most other mammals. Darkness,
familiar smells, privacy and quiet are the main
ingredients for a smooth birth. Who in North America
can give these simple things to a birthing mother?
Are we willing to trade monitoring and charting
for births that truly flow along smoothly? Are
we willing to sit, out of view of the woman, completely
still while she focuses inward and makes her own
journey to meeting her child? Can we forego getting
the acknowledgement and appreciation for all we
"do" and be deeply satisfied with "being"
unobtrusive?
I have been blessed with a midwifery partner,
Mary Sullivan, who is always on alert for unnecessary
intervention. At one birth, a quiet, religious
woman pushed out a baby girl who did not pink
up and cry quickly. The mother was holding the
baby and, not wanting to suction, I urged her
"Talk to your baby, tell your baby to breathe!"
The mother spoke a few words to the baby, the
baby pinked up and soon was nursing well. Later,
when we drove home together Mary told me that
she really disagreed with me intervening by telling
the mother to "talk" to her baby. She
pointed out that I am a real talker but that this
mother was very quiet verbally- she had been talking
to her baby through touch of the baby's skin,
that was more her way. I had completely missed
that communication because it wasn't my
way. I learned to watch closer to the cues of
the mammatoto and not be so fast to make it fit
my pictures of what "should" be happening.
Another woman taught me a big lesson about timing
and patience. This woman had a homebirth for her
first baby who arrived at 36 weeks gestational
age. The baby was only 6 pounds at birth, but
the whole process seemed very painful for the
mother. When she pushed out her placenta, it bulged
at the introitus for what seemed like a long time.
It was tempting to just give it a tug and complete
the third stage but I just waited and finally
the mother pushed it out into the bowl. Later,
when I was helping her dry off after a shower
she said "You know, Gloria, I can't understand
how anyone could ever say birth is sexual! That
hurt like hell and there was not one sexual thing
about it. But.... that placenta, now that
was sexual!" To this day, I have no idea
what she experienced but I am so happy that she
had that time to experience the birth of her placenta
in a special way.
I believe that the 3 P's of obstetrics should
be Patience, Patience, Patience and not Passage,
Passenger and Powers. I am fond of the Buddhist
words from the Tao of Leadership:
"Being a Midwife"
Remember that you are facilitating another person's
process. It is not your process. Do not intrude.
Do not control. Do not force your own needs and
insights into the foreground.
If you do not trust a person's process, that
person will not trust you.
Imagine that you are a midwife; you are assisting
at someone else's birth. Do good without show
or fuss. Facilitate what is happening rather than
what you think ought to be happening. If you must
take the lead, lead so that the mother is helped,
yet still free and in charge.
When the baby is born, the mother will rightly
say: "We did it ourselves!"
From: The Tao of Leadership, John Heider
|